Perplexity launches Perplexity for Public Safety with free Enterprise Pro access for agencies

Details

• Perplexity announced Perplexity for Public Safety, an offering designed for law enforcement and public safety organizations.
• The program gives qualifying agencies free access to Perplexity Enterprise Pro for 12 months for up to 200 seats.
• The platform is positioned to support decisions from the field through courtroom preparation, emphasizing trusted, accurate AI responses.
• Perplexity highlights enterprise-grade security and data governance, stating that Enterprise deployments do not train on customer data.
• The offering aligns with a broader shift toward sector-specific AI tools for regulated, high-stakes environments such as policing and public safety.
• Agencies can use the service across devices, enabling officers and staff to draw on AI assistance in mobile, investigative, and administrative workflows.
• The free tier is intended to lower budget and procurement barriers so departments can test and operationalize AI-assisted workflows before committing to larger rollouts.

Impact

Perplexity’s public safety launch signals how answer-engine style AI is moving deeper into regulated, high-liability domains, where evidentiary standards and auditability matter as much as accuracy. By effectively underwriting a year-long pilot for up to 200 users per agency, Perplexity is betting that once law enforcement teams experience AI-assisted research, report drafting, and case preparation in real workflows, they will push for sustained funding and broader deployment. The emphasis on security, non-training on agency data, and mobile readiness speaks to a competitive landscape that includes not just frontier-model providers but also incumbents in legal research, records systems, and public safety software. Over the next 12–24 months, this type of verticalized, low-friction program is likely to accelerate experimentation with AI inside police departments and related agencies, while simultaneously sharpening policy debates over how far such tools should extend into operational decision-making, evidence handling, and civil liberties-sensitive use cases.