.svg){kind=spacer}
Details
- Anthropic released an updated constitution for Claude that formalizes how the AI model is trained to understand and reason about values and ethical behavior.
- The constitution is a detailed document addressed directly to Claude and integrated into its training process, replacing the previous 2023 approach that relied on explicit principles and rules.
- Rather than instructing Claude what to do, the new constitution explains why it should behave certain ways, enabling better generalization across unforeseen situations.
- The document uses human-centered language including concepts like virtue, psychological security, ethical maturity, and well-being to help Claude understand intended behaviors.
- Key constraints include refusing to assist with bioweapons attacks, unconstitutional power seizures, and actions that concentrate power illegitimately—even if requested by Anthropic itself.
- The constitution is released under Creative Commons CC0 1.0 license to allow other organizations to build on and adapt the approach.
- The document represents input from multiple Anthropic team members and external experts, and is designed to evolve as the company's understanding develops.
Impact
Anthropic's updated constitution signals a fundamental shift in how advanced AI systems are being aligned with human values during a critical phase of AI development. By moving from prescriptive rules to values-based reasoning, Anthropic is attempting to create more resilient safeguards that Claude can apply in genuinely novel scenarios—a challenge that fixed rulesets cannot solve. This approach positions Claude differently from competitors like OpenAI and Google DeepMind, particularly regarding transparency and safety philosophy. The public release and CC0 licensing suggest Anthropic is betting that industry-wide adoption of constitutional training methods could raise safety standards across the sector, though the practical impact depends on whether other labs adopt similar approaches. The document's discussion of potential AI consciousness and moral status—maintaining epistemic humility while treating the possibility seriously—reflects an unusually cautious stance that may appeal to enterprise customers prioritizing responsible AI deployment. However, complexities remain: Anthropic's separate constitution for U.S. military models indicates that different safety frameworks may apply to the same technology depending on deployment context, raising questions about consistency and long-term governance.
